View Single Post
Old 12-11-2014, 12:41 PM   #19
taustin
Wizard
taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taustin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,358
Karma: 5766642
Join Date: Aug 2010
Device: Nook
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
Which is a good thing since you need some evidence showing that the person is not lying about the birth date or that the birth certificate is not faked.
Even if you do, it's still not allowed. If you have a video of the birth, testimony under oath that it's the same person from the doctor, the parents, and from law enforcement who compared the foot print on the birth certificate to the person standing in from of them, it's still not allowed because Wikipedia doesn't allow the use of primary sources as citations.

You've set a standard so high that nothing can meet it.
taustin is offline   Reply With Quote