Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres
They are stretching the bounds of the ruling a bit.
Here's TELEREAD's take:
|
One bit I'm also interested in from that link, is the bit about the DMCA. Since removal of DRM from ebooks isn't in the exceptions allowed, I wonder why they didn't just sue under the DMCA rather than going for a contributory infringement, maybe the outcome would have been different? Maybe they'll file a new case under the DMCA now?
Unless they're not sure trafficking in really does just mean pointing people to an application, especially when nothing that application does nor the site it's on has anything to do with DRM removal.