Thread: Encyclopędia Britannica competing with Wikipedia?
View Single Post
Old 12-10-2014, 01:57 AM   #4
meeera
Grand Sorcerer
meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.meeera ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
meeera's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,827
Karma: 68407974
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Libra 2, iPadMini4, iPad4, MBP; support other Kobo/Kindles
Quote:
Originally Posted by rollei View Post
Encyclopedia Britannica, assuming it is written by staff writers, is certainly more reliable than Wikipedia.
Welllll..... not quite "certainly". The accuracy at Wikipedia is surprisingly good.

http://news.cnet.com/Study-Wikipedia...3-5997332.html
meeera is offline   Reply With Quote