Thread: Encyclopędia Britannica competing with Wikipedia?
View Single Post
Old 12-09-2014, 10:35 PM   #3
rollei
Addict
rollei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rollei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rollei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rollei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rollei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rollei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rollei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rollei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rollei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rollei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rollei ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 219
Karma: 1000210
Join Date: Mar 2014
Device: Kobo
Encyclopedia Britannica, assuming it is written by staff writers, is certainly more reliable than Wikipedia. Wikipedia, however, should have a wider range of topics including those that are not normally found in a encyclopedia.
rollei is offline   Reply With Quote