View Single Post
Old 12-07-2014, 09:31 AM   #65
DuckieTigger
Wizard
DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DuckieTigger ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DuckieTigger's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,764
Karma: 246906703
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: USA
Device: Oasis 3, Oasis 2, PW3, PW1, KT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shades View Post
I can't name a single person that I know that wouldn't want the option of expandable storage in any of their entertainment electronics and yes that would include phones, ereaders and tablets.

I'm honestly not sure why you're arguing against a feature that can only be a boon to the consumer. There is no downside to having an SD slot. It's there if you ever need it, but if you don't you still have WiFi/3G/LTE. It's not as if the slot takes away any of the other features.
You are talking about a Kindle. The decision to not put an SD card in it is deliberate, not a cost saving. Would it attract more people to buy a Kindle? Sure, but not for the reasons Amazon wants. SD card is only useful for DRM free content so that it can be used for multiple devices - otherwise a large (e.g. 16 gb) internal storage would be fine.
DuckieTigger is offline   Reply With Quote