View Single Post
Old 12-02-2008, 10:28 AM   #10
Shaggy
Wizard
Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shaggy ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Shaggy's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,293
Karma: 529619
Join Date: May 2007
Device: iRex iLiad, DR800SG
Quote:
Originally Posted by wallcraft View Post
Sony has not released any specs for the PRS-700 full screen refresh rate so far as I know, so you may be right about it being the same speed in the end. A side by side comparison is probably the only way to tell for sure, and even then there may be issues like optimal ebook format for each device.
Yeah, iRex did the same thing with the DR by optimizing a lot of the way the driver works. Still, of the 0.85s refresh rate people are talking about with the DR, 0.80s of that is the eInk.

Older devices usually had a 1.0s or higher refresh rate, and a lot of that was due to slow drivers (.80 for the eInk plus .20 - .50 for the driver). That's what they're comparing the PRS-700 to when they say that it's much faster. The same is true for the DR.

You can do a lot of optimizing (.05 with the newer drivers), but you're not going to make a huge difference, no matter how much hype there is about a new device, until eInk technology improves. Every device is still based off of a 0.80s vizplex eInk screen, including the PRS-700.
Shaggy is offline   Reply With Quote