View Single Post
Old 12-02-2008, 09:45 AM   #30
Taylor514ce
Actively passive.
Taylor514ce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Taylor514ce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Taylor514ce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Taylor514ce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Taylor514ce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Taylor514ce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Taylor514ce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Taylor514ce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Taylor514ce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Taylor514ce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Taylor514ce ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Taylor514ce's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,042
Karma: 478376
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: US
Device: Sony PRS-505/LC
I read your post several times. Perhaps my lack of education in economics is showing, but I have a hard time understanding phrases such as "the opportunity costs of deploying capital".

The cost to produce an eBook isn't based on the selling price of a trade paperback, which seems to be the argument, here. Are you saying if publishers wouldn't spend money producing trade paperbacks, eBooks would cost less because there would be more money overall in "the bucket"? I don't see that, either, because trade paperbacks make a profit.

In short, I don't see any direct link between production of trade paperbacks and the cost/price of eBooks, other than the artificial pricing structure of eBook selling price = current print edition price.

Hard covers also "sell for a lot", yet that hasn't stopped an investment in eBook infrastructure.
Taylor514ce is offline   Reply With Quote