View Single Post
Old 12-05-2014, 01:08 PM   #23
Peter Ahlstrom
Connoisseur
Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 80
Karma: 500000
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Utah
Device: iPad
But I'm never presenting anything out of order. Having two or three references in a row to the exact same location is not violating linear document order. I'm not listing A B C and then saying "for D and E, skip back over C and look at B again"—that would be a violation of linear document reading order.

Regardless, I'm giving up this fight. Since the playOrder is explicitly optional, and since I'm not happy with the other suggestions here, I'll just delete all the playOrder attributes next time. That's easier to do with a regex search than renumbering things manually.

I officially withdraw my bug report. If this issue ever comes up for me again in the future, I'll just deal with it myself.
Peter Ahlstrom is offline   Reply With Quote