View Single Post
Old 12-04-2014, 08:39 PM   #21
rcentros
eReader Wrangler
rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rcentros ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rcentros's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,894
Karma: 52566355
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Boise, ID
Device: PB HD3, GL3, Voyage, Clara HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
Half-heartedly isn't the proper term.
They jumped in enthusiastically but they made several "me-too" decisions that came back to haunt them and one thoroughly misguided, over-aggressive move. Sometimes they acted as if they were in the hardware business, others as if they were in the content business, but never synch'ed the two.
They never got their infrastructure fixed, but I don't think they died in 2010. I wasn't until 2011 that I even bought my first eReader, a Nook Simple Touch. And I don't think it was any one decision or day, I think it was just death by slow non-innovation. I still think the Nook Simple Touch was one of the best designed eReaders ever made. Barnes & Noble had something going there, for awhile. They just kind of dropped the ball. And people lost patience when advertised features -- like syncing between devices -- continued not to work.

As for Microsoft and the lawsuits, I think Microsoft was genuinely worried that B&N had something with their anti-trust allegations. I think that's why they invested into the Nook division.
rcentros is offline   Reply With Quote