Quote:
Originally Posted by =X=
You are interpreting the wrong meaning of the word "free". That's the problem with the word "Free" it is ambiguous.
GPL and open source believe software should be "free" as in "liberated" not as in beer. Open source has always been okay with charging for software but the source code MUST always be provided.
=X=
|
So advocates of GPL want software to be liberated as long as you abide by their rules? Seems a bit of a contradiction. I want software to be truly liberated so that anyone can do whatever they like with it: sell it, give it away, copy it, modify it - no strings attached.