View Single Post
Old 11-28-2014, 07:33 PM   #7
Peter Ahlstrom
Connoisseur
Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Peter Ahlstrom ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 80
Karma: 500000
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Utah
Device: iPad
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinH View Post
Hi,
You can't have both correct at the same time without this structure, can you
I'm not sure what you're saying. I can have it correct; I already made the ncx valid by manually editing it so the playOrders of those entries were the same as each other. So everything is great now. Having multiple items with the same playOrder is apparently perfectly valid, because it validates. Or is this something listed in the spec but the validator isn't checking for it?

I just think that Sigil should accommodate this valid data in the first place. Is it that much of a pain for Sigil to be coded to check whether any of the TOC targets are the same, and if so, make them have the same playOrder?

I don't want to remove extraneous elements from the ncx because then it will say
Chapter Title
2
3
and people will wonder "where's #1?"
Peter Ahlstrom is offline   Reply With Quote