View Single Post
Old 11-27-2014, 03:53 AM   #6
knc1
Going Viral
knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.knc1 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
knc1's Avatar
 
Posts: 17,212
Karma: 18210809
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Central Texas
Device: No K1, PW2, KV, KOA
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawhill View Post
"illegal instruction" points at a bad executable. Most curious, I thought that the PW2's CPU ought to be downwards compatible to what has been there before.
It is, it should.
At least for the **core** instruction set.
The "optional" core add-in units are not that forgiving.

For instance, if the co-process (or sub-processor) that does fast, hardware, multiple was not included in the cpu build ...

The main cpu will only throw a:
-EGIVEUPALLHOPE
sort of error code. (like this one )

So the text of the error message might not be an exact description of what happened.

Getting an strace of the execution attempt would help refine the error message.
knc1 is offline   Reply With Quote