View Single Post
Old 11-23-2014, 09:01 PM   #32
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,438
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
Plenty of anecdotal reports to be found.
Like this one:

http://www.thepassivevoice.com/11/20...comment-269132

Problem is, none of the incidents involve Amazon at all because they are just a retailer.
Your link amounts to a negative book review that never gets around to naming the book! Or the publisher.

For all we know, the book in question was released by Amazon Publishing (the Amazon publishing arm which pays advances).

There's always a danger that heavy editing will make a book worse. But the idea that this commonly happens is an extraordinary claim for which there needs to be evidence. The most convincing form of evidence might be actual examples of authors whose books became better when they stopped being structurally edited.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote