View Single Post
Old 11-14-2014, 09:39 AM   #136
KevinH
Sigil Developer
KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.KevinH ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 8,913
Karma: 6120478
Join Date: Nov 2009
Device: many
Hi Hitch,

I am not claiming it is the only rule and I am not claiming that it explains all cases. I am just saying it fits Peter's usage case almost exactly.

Since you have one example of something similar to Peter's strange case, did it in fact use or include a named font family on a p tag (not even necessarily an embedded font - Peter's was not) that could in fact have covered the bulk (50% or more) of the text, and then been made an implied "main" body font?

If so, that would confirm that mode of rejecting fonts, and we can then build a font tool of our own to test for cases like this.

Take care,

KevinH
KevinH is online now   Reply With Quote