View Single Post
Old 11-06-2014, 01:36 PM   #13
TimW
Wizard
TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.TimW ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
TimW's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 6824104
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Southeastern Kentucky
Device: KK3G, KPW1, Sony PRST1, Sony PRS350, iPod Touch 5G
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomsem View Post
By using their own DRM, and not providing an ePub download (protected with more 'portable' Adobe DRM), Kobo (or indirectly, the publisher) avoids having to pay royalties to Adobe. Same reason B&N stopped letting people download ePub (except in apps they have not yet updated), and why Nook devices always used a hidden partition for wireless downloads. It's about maximizing profit, and reducing costs associated with customer support. 'Download' option is going to result in customer support calls as well as royalties, given the relative complexity DRM introduces.

If there's a correlation with ePub3, it may be just because they apply this policy going forward with new ebooks and grandfather ePub download for books purchased earlier.

Of course none of this has anything to do with customer preferences or convenience or their 'security'.

As most people probably never bother to stray outside the boundaries of the walled gardens (or just travel between them to visit their various 'libraries'), this is unlikely to have many implications for ebook adoption rates, or the adoption of ePub3 (whatever that means when nobody has access to a 'file'). But for people with a more 'traditional' approach to building a personal library by collecting books or files thereof, it is a disaster in the making.

As long as publishers/authors insist on DRM, perhaps what is needed is some sort of independent brokerage where customer purchases would be automatically registered, and thereafter the content could be accessed from whatever (participating) ecosystem they wanted to use, without having to purchase them again or touch a DRM infested file. The ecosystems would not necessarily even need to sell ebooks but could offer services (reading apps and devices as well as cloud services) on subscription or ad-supported basis.

But I see no signs that publishers or retailers are interested in solving these kinds of issues, or at least the cooperation that would involve is impossible to achieve. Obviously the simplest solution for everyone would be to abandon DRM.
B&N seems to think it was a security issue. Official B&N rep Alex Garcia(bold is mine):

Quote:

Hi all,

Sorry for the confusion and any inconvenience this may cause. As you see by now, the ability to download from the NOOK® website and then sideload certain NOOK eBooks has been discontinued. This was done as part of a recent security update.

However, content that has previously been downloaded can continue to be sideloaded to NOOK devices. Also, you can continue to access all of your purchased content through the NOOK Library® on any NOOK device or Free NOOK Reading App™ as you've always been able to do.

Additionally, customers can also continue to sideload other supported file formats.

Hope this helps!

- Alex
https://bookclubs.barnesandnoble.com...stream&ru=5054
TimW is offline   Reply With Quote