View Single Post
Old 11-04-2014, 10:12 AM   #159
frahse
occasional author
frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.frahse ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
frahse's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,315
Karma: 2064403292
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Wandering God's glorious hills, valleys and plains.
Device: A Franklin BI (before Internet) was the first. I still have it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tubemonkey View Post
The problem is, it wasn't priced as such. The Fire Phone best compares to the Nexus 5 and the OnePlus One; both of which were priced well under it. Even after the $200 price cut, the other two phones are still cheaper.

Phone Comparison
  • Fire Phone --> 649 (32G) --- 749 (64G) --> price at release Jul 14
  • Fire Phone --> 449 (32G) --- 549 (64G) --> after price cut Sep 14
  • Nexus 5 ----> 349 (16G) --- 399 (32G)
  • One+ One --> 299 (16G) --- 349 (64G)
Let me rephrase. Amazon has a reputation as a cost cutter but didn't seem to do it with the Fire Phone. That was the problem that caused poor sales.
frahse is offline   Reply With Quote