View Single Post
Old 10-30-2014, 04:36 AM   #38
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,557
Karma: 93980341
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by crane3 View Post
Given the shouts by various countries about "violations of air space", I would expect the over supply of lawyers will enter into the fray with lawsuits about violations of one's home's air space.
You have no legal rights to the airspace over your home. This is a well-established legal principle which stems from numerous court cases involving people trying to get planes from local airports banned from overflying their houses.

There can of course be separate issues with noise pollution, invasion of privacy, etc.

Anyone who has ever flown - or been near - the type of commercial multi-rotor UAV that would be required for this postulated service will know that they are not exactly inconspicuous. They are noisy. Very, VERY noisy.

Last edited by HarryT; 10-30-2014 at 05:01 AM.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote