View Single Post
Old 10-29-2014, 10:46 PM   #10
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rollei View Post
Are you saying you are running FF 33.0.2 and when you click poodletest.com, you get a "vulnerable" response?
Yes.

In general these sort of tests are better for proving the presence of vulnerabilities, because if you are vulnerable once you can and will be again.

However, saying you aren't vulnerable... is it because you truly are protected, or because anything down to a random glitch prevented the connection going through and thus fooled the test?

I remember the same confusion wih the Heartbleed tests, but at least those warned you of the uncertainty.
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote