View Single Post
Old 10-29-2014, 02:11 PM   #4
tubemonkey
monkey on the fringe
tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tubemonkey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
tubemonkey's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,780
Karma: 158733736
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Seattle Metro
Device: Moto E6, Echo Show
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike L View Post
Thanks for posting this. It's an interesting item.

One thing I am curious about is this statements:

I wonder who will remunerate the rights owners. Is it the organisation or individual (such as a museum) which is reproducing the work? That would seem to defeat the object. Or is the Intellectual Property Office? And if so, where does the money come from?

I'm only asking out of curiosity. I'm not trying to make a point.

Mike
If rights holders do come forward, they should be compensated for future use, not past use. Where were they and why didn't they come forward earlier?
tubemonkey is offline   Reply With Quote