View Single Post
Old 10-23-2014, 09:13 AM   #24
QuantumIguana
Philosopher
QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.QuantumIguana ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
QuantumIguana's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,034
Karma: 18736532
Join Date: Jan 2012
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2 gen, Kindle Fire 1st Gen, Kindle Touch
When someone asks you if you read a book, they aren't asking you if you gazed at sheets of paper. If someone holds up a paper book and says "Did you read this book?" They probably don't mean to ask if you read this particular paper book, or even that you read it in paper format. What they mean is whether you read the content. Answering "no", because you read an e-book version would lead to confusion. Denying that Don Quixote is a book leads to absurdities.

The word book can and does often refer both to the media and the content. Before e-books, the distinction didn't matter much. Imagine an author sells 1,000 copies of their story in paper format and 1,000 copies in e-book format. If you asked that author how many books they sold, would they say 1,000 or 2,000? If they said 1,000, because only paper books are books, that would lead to confusion. Paper books are one definition of book, but they are only one definition. Most of the time, the format is simply irrelevant.
QuantumIguana is offline   Reply With Quote