Quote:
Originally Posted by ApK
Then you are utterly missing, or more likely, intentionally obfuscating, the point.
|
What point?
I thought that the point was that having a copy would make the action av lending the book different in the way that you ought not to lend the paper book. But that is not the case.
And we have been told her that making a paper copy of a paper book is not copyright infringement in the US so what is the problem with first making a copy and then lending the paper book?