View Single Post
Old 10-15-2014, 08:00 AM   #7
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,664
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxaris View Post
Dangerous advice... This surely depends on the warning.
Dangerous? Hardly. The worst that can happen is the program won't work. In all my years of compiling stuff on Linux, I've never really encountered a warning that affected the final result -- IF the compilation process ultimately finished successfully. And I've rarely compiled any large projects where there weren't warnings along the way (especially with code that's going to be compiled with multiple compilers on multiple platforms). Cavalier?? Possibly ... but not dangerous. Especially when I'm familiar with blackest's particular warning and know that it can be safely ignored. So I have no problem telling anyone who ended up with a functioning version of Sigil that they can ignore any warnings they may have encountered during compilation. Welcome to cross-platform compilation.

Perhaps I should have said; "ignore them until they won't allow you to ignore them any more," but that seems like a given to me. *shrug*

Last edited by DiapDealer; 10-15-2014 at 08:47 AM.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote