View Single Post
Old 10-14-2014, 04:00 AM   #120
Pulpmeister
Wizard
Pulpmeister ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pulpmeister ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pulpmeister ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pulpmeister ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pulpmeister ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pulpmeister ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pulpmeister ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pulpmeister ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pulpmeister ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pulpmeister ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pulpmeister ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,842
Karma: 29145056
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Perth Western Australia
Device: kindle
Looking back at the OP, it seems the OP's Dad thinks fantasy started in recent years.

In fact, there's been a thriving fantasy publishing history since the early 19th century, and even earlier. After all, what is A Midsummer Night's Dream if it isn't fantasy?

Fantasy in the 19th and 20th centuries drifted in and out of the "weird" category, and the magazine "Weird Tales" carried a great deal of fantasy in the 1930s.

King Solomon's Mines isn't fantasy-- the mines were a popular myth of the era, and the warriors of Kukuanaland, while warriors of a mythical kingdom, are closely based on reality. The "She" books are fantasy, having as they do a central character who lives forever by bathing in a magical fire.

William Hope Hodgson, a leading fantasy writer, is noted for "The House on the Borderland" (1908) which is very definitely fantasy, way before Tolkien, and nothing like him.

If we just look at post-Tolkien fantasy, it's obvious that there's an awful lot of derivative stuff riding on that particular bandwagon, but there are plenty who do not. I mentioned R A Lafferty, definitely post-Tolkien and owing nothing at all to him, as one I've read.

I'm not much of a fantasy reader, so I haven't kept up with the current scene, except Terry Pratchett. And, as I say, Lafferty.

I note that the Wikipedia entry on Fantasy as a literary genre is very scant indeed.
Pulpmeister is offline   Reply With Quote