Quote:
Originally Posted by Geralt
Ok, even if the majority of his work is not SF, his most famous books are SF.
Plus, it would be silly to argue that he didn't have an impact in science fiction history so even if he's not mainly a science fiction writer, he wrote science fiction....sooooo....  |
I can agree with that
. He was clearly an author who was very influential in the history of what we now call SF.
EDIT:
Interesting to note what Wikipedia has to say on the subject:
Quote:
A primary issue at the heart of the dispute (about the relationship between Verne's Voyages Extraordinaires and the literary genre of science fiction) is the question of whether Verne's works count as science fiction to begin with. Verne himself argued repeatedly in interviews that his novels were not meant to be read as scientific, saying "I do not in any way pose as a scientist"[105] and "I have invented nothing."[106] His own goal was rather to "depict the earth [and] at the same time to realize a very high ideal of beauty of style",[72] as he pointed out in an example:
Quote:
|
I wrote Five Weeks in a Balloon, not as a story about ballooning, but as a story about Africa. I always was greatly interested in geography and travel, and I wanted to give a romantic description of Africa. Now, there was no means of taking my travellers through Africa otherwise than in a balloon, and that is why a balloon is introduced.… I may say that at the time I wrote the novel, as now, I had no faith in the possibility of ever steering balloons…[72]
|
Closely related to Verne's science-fiction reputation is the often-repeated claim that he is a "prophet" of scientific progress, and that many of his novels involve elements of technology that were fantastic for his day but later became commonplace.[107] These claims have a long history, especially in America, but the modern scholarly consensus is that such claims of prophecy are heavily exaggerated.[108] As with science fiction, Verne himself flatly denied classification as a futuristic prophet, saying that any connection between scientific developments and his work were "mere coincidence" and attributing his indisputable scientific accuracy to his extensive research: "even before I began writing stories, I always took numerous notes out of every book, newspaper, magazine, or scientific report that I came across."[105]
|