View Single Post
Old 10-09-2014, 01:48 PM   #160
Difflugia
Testate Amoeba
Difflugia ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Difflugia ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Difflugia ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Difflugia ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Difflugia ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Difflugia ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Difflugia ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Difflugia ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Difflugia ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Difflugia ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Difflugia ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Difflugia's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,049
Karma: 27300000
Join Date: Sep 2012
Device: Many Android devices, Kindle 2, Toshiba e755 PocketPC
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApK View Post
Related to Harry's point:
This is probably too broadly political for general forum discussion, but if the lawyers among us could give me some quick citation or link, it would be helpful:

What is the basis for the "right" to privacy that so many people seem think they have?

Not looking to argue, just genuinely asking for my own edification.
The US Supreme Court has ruled (and then subsequently affirmed) that there is a constitutional right to privacy, but there are (at least) two problems with specifically applying it here. First, the entity that US citizens have a right to privacy from is the US government and not Adobe. Second, the full breadth of the right to privacy has never been spelled out and lower courts have ruled both ways in different circumstances.
Difflugia is offline   Reply With Quote