View Single Post
Old 10-07-2014, 12:17 PM   #45
GeoffR
Wizard
GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffR ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
GeoffR's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,821
Karma: 19162882
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Te Riu-a-Māui
Device: Kobo Glo
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyn2012 View Post
However, I can't see anything wrong with line 167. Can anyone shed some light on this please?
In the example libnickel.so.1.0.0.patch line 167 looked like this:
Code:
replace_int = CB4AFC, 24, 31
But in your patch the 24 has been changed to 23, which is causing the mismatch.

In general the replacement lines in a patch look like:
Code:
replace_int = ADDRESS, ORIGINAL, REPLACEMENT
Only the REPLACEMENT values should be changed, the ADDRESS and ORIGINAL values must stay as they are.
GeoffR is offline   Reply With Quote