Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitch
+1.
Varlog:
Hey, as long as you're happy to answer all the questions from all the users that have issues due to it, great. I don't mean to sound snippy, but the truth is, a huge percentage of the posts on the Sigil forum are about "bugs" (hmph) that happen because John Doe thinks it's a word-processor and TREATS it as such.
|
it is too general statement for me. Cannot judge its relevance, point me to actual cases?
Quote:
I don't understand why "preview" isn't good enough. I don't care about taking the option away from you, as long as the rest of us (who don't use it) don't have to reply to all the questions caused thereby. And, to be clear, that we aren't expected to support further enhancements in that (the word-processing/WYSIWYG) area, over productivity enhancements.
Hitch
|
I will have to look at preview again. Because of my personal pursuits it could be that I am somehow not in the picture perhaps
.
Nevertheless I think preview is something above casual user (just looked at it). I think casual user uses BookView. I did
. And do! Knowing what I do.
Getting casual users hooked is a feature Sigil should not lose. They will advance or not. Professionals, as you, won't have problems with advancing. The rest of us will too - according to needs and abilities. Be generous
. It is open source.