View Single Post
Old 10-05-2014, 11:15 AM   #75
Catlady
Grand Sorcerer
Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Catlady ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Catlady's Avatar
 
Posts: 7,421
Karma: 52734361
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: Kindle Fire, Kindle Paperwhite, AGPTek Bluetooth Clip
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr ploppy View Post
Why is it silly to ask for a list of error-free books? I would have thought such a list would be very useful to every user of this site. Why keep it to yourself?
Because I NEVER CLAIMED THAT EVEN ONE SUCH BOOK EXISTS!

Love how you still ignore the fact that you completely warped and misrepresented what I said, even when confronted with the black-and-white evidence.

Quote:
Do you have an alternative theory as to why books became bloated and boring at the same time large quantities of people stopped reading?
Now it's a theory? Originally you presented it as a statement of cause and effect ("bloated and boring" books caused decline in readership). YOU presented the argument, it's up to you to defend it, not to try to turn it around on the person challenging you.

Suppose I were to say, "People who stand on their heads while reading retain more information than those who don't," and you then skeptically ask, "What's the evidence for that?" Would it make any sense whatsoever for me to respond, "Prove that they don't" and put the burden on you?

I'm done.
Catlady is offline   Reply With Quote