View Single Post
Old 10-05-2014, 10:53 AM   #5
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,435
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
Nope. Just accusing them of having picked a side.
The way I see it, the New York Times and Washington Post are the umpire for factual US-oriented issues that might be discussed in a forum like this. And the Public Editor is the umpire of the umpires. So, despite liking the side picked, I have no argument with what you write.

When reading at least one the articles in question, I did think it should have been stamped, on the side, with the word "Analysis." Years ago, newspapers commonly did that when an editor noticed, in a reported article, that most of the quotes were going in one direction.

Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
It's been a talking point for months: buy an NYT ad, get fawning editorial coverage for free two day before.
Amazon puts multi-page inserts in the Sunday paper before Christmas. Please show me the fawning pro-Amazon December articles.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote