View Single Post
Old 10-02-2014, 03:43 PM   #69
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Precisely. The Windows 95 version of my astronomy software (highly complex architecturally, multi-threaded, etc) runs absolutely fine nearly 20 years later on Windows 8.1. Why? Because I wrote it properly and followed all the rules.
I agree, I am just saying, "don't" is not the same as "shouldn't".

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
... except that you don't test for Windows versions like that. You do it by calling the "GetVersion" or "GetVersionEx" Windows APIs, and they return Windows versions as a "major" and "minor" version number, not a string. There's no possible way to confuse Windows 95 with Windows 9. Windows 95 returns a version of "4.0", Windows 98 is "4.1".
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote