Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterT
Um surely you WANT checky just not fixey!
|
Elsewhere I mentioned that I wrote my own program to finish the book I was working on when I gave up on Sigil. I am 95% of the way through the final proofread. When I get it done I will have to decide if I want to make it general purpose, i.e., start a new book, open an existing book, etc. Now, it has NO error checking. And if I rewrite it, it will have NO error checking.
It has a viewer to view a file. It displays just what it gets; if something's wrong, it's usually fairly obvious where it is. Every now and then I run it through the idpf validator and fix any errors that pop up.
I'm not as hung up on errors as Sigil seems to be. I'm trying to put a book together. I'm concerned with typos, spelling, grammar, and "could that be written better?" When I get it all put together, I run it thru the validator until I've swatted all the bugs. Then I run thru a final proofread and correct content and style errors, then back to the validator. If there are any errors, I'm going to find them somewhere along the line.