View Single Post
Old 09-23-2014, 05:00 PM   #495
j.p.s
Grand Sorcerer
j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.j.p.s ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 5,798
Karma: 103362673
Join Date: Apr 2011
Device: pb360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katsunami View Post
I don't think so. If you create a 2GB partition on a 4 or 8GB card, the exact same amount of space will be taken up as would be on a 2GB card, starting from the beginning. The rest is just unallocated space, never to be used. It's not the case that creating a 2GB partition on an 8GB card will 'smear' the partition over the entire card.

If this had been the case, you would indeed have been right: such a '2GB' card would last longer because of spreading the write cycles around.
Look up "wear leveling" for flash memory. This is done at a very low level. The memory device has no knowledge of its partitioning and after a few writes, the mapping of logical sector number to actual device location becomes spaghetti. That is why "defragmenting" a flash memory device is a bad idea.
j.p.s is online now   Reply With Quote