View Single Post
Old 09-22-2014, 05:30 AM   #160
rhadin
Literacy = Understanding
rhadin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rhadin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rhadin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rhadin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rhadin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rhadin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rhadin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rhadin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rhadin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rhadin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.rhadin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
rhadin's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,833
Karma: 59674358
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The World of Books
Device: Nook, Nook Tablet
Quote:
Originally Posted by eschwartz View Post
I don't think the question is whether or not you will accept it.

The question is whether or not you will believe it.
If Cote is upheld, I will accept it. I will believe it is correct and sound legal reasoning as much as I believe the Citizen's United and the Bush v. Gore decisions are sound nonpartisan legal decisions, or that the Hobby Lobby case would have been decided as it was if the justices weren't driven by their personal Catholic religious views.

All that the current Supreme Court can ever expect from thinking citizens is acceptance. Belief that they are well thought-out, sound legal decisions that will be remembered 100 years from now for incisive legal reasoning is an unreasonable expectation and one that none but perhaps Scalia would entertain.
rhadin is offline   Reply With Quote