Quote:
Originally Posted by pwalker8
Seriously? I've posted a ton of links on this case over the last year and a half in the various threads discussing the case. If you really don't know, then the place to start is the text of Apple's appeal. The next most obvious place to start is with some of the WSJ's pieces on the case [ http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...36261045331876 ]
I'm sure the usual suspects will immediately launch the ad homiem attacks on the WSJ, but certainly the WSJ in their various editorials and stories (and there are a number, not just the link that I gave here) brings most of the lines of argument together. |
Yay, another paywalled opinion piece. And you didn't quote anything from it to support your point, for the benefit of the majority of people, who don't subscribe to the WSJ just to argue with you about it.
(Note my repeated use of ad hominem attacks every time I raise this objection.
)