View Single Post
Old 09-19-2014, 03:32 AM   #26
Ghitulescu
Fanatic
Ghitulescu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ghitulescu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ghitulescu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ghitulescu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ghitulescu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ghitulescu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ghitulescu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ghitulescu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ghitulescu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ghitulescu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Ghitulescu ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 563
Karma: 403106
Join Date: Aug 2014
Device: PRS-T1
I said text and images are already featured in ePubs (and other eBooks).

Videos are however difficult to display on a slow display as eInk. Audio support in eReaders has been dropped since long. Concerning the latter I thought that Sony which also manufactures MP3-players would have seen it as a market split, but this move occurred to Kindle as well and probably all others.

While it's true that ePubs could be used on a variety of devices with bonus features, why amend them the ePubs to de usable only on those devices but not on these originally developed? Wouldn't be better to use a native format for those feature-enhanced devices? When it was the last time when you opened a paper book and saw a video in it? Leave alone Harry Potter, this is pure fantasy

I mean (again) if such an enhanced device can read HTML (to give an example) and HTML allows for videos and music/audio embedding (like internet does), why not use this format - in the end ePub is based on (stricter) HTML, so no conversion loss can be assessed.

I would however agree with you, if the content and/or format conversion had to be lossy (like those portables that play MP3 but not the original CD WAV format), I would also be supporting this opinion. But as long as an alternative format, better suited for a particular device exists, why not taking advantages of its strengths instead of butchering a stable format, which seems to be, from this vantage point, insufficient.
Ghitulescu is offline   Reply With Quote