View Single Post
Old 09-17-2014, 05:37 PM   #113
eschwartz
Ex-Helpdesk Junkie
eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.eschwartz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
eschwartz's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,421
Karma: 85400180
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: The Beaten Path, USA, Roundworld, This Side of Infinity
Device: Kindle Touch fw5.3.7 (Wifi only)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApK View Post
I was not aware of any implicit negative connotation to "fat cat" other than the fact that it's typically used by the "have-nots" to describe the "haves." That is, it's unlikely that one billionaire businessman would describe another as a fat cat to other billionaires.

Personally, while I never thought of the term implying that the person did little to earn their wealth, I always took it to mean that they NO LONGER need to worry about earning, they can sit back and enjoy the power of their position, just like a literal fat cat can contentedly spend it's day napping rather than having to fight for scraps in the alley.

OK, as you were.
Precisely, and in this case, that would be Douglas Preston and James Patterson and their ilk.


But not the vast majority of signatories, who were merely fooled, due to their recently-discovered lack of intellectual capacity (ironic in an actual list of people who make their living off of the written word): https://www.mobileread.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=246443
eschwartz is offline   Reply With Quote