View Single Post
Old 09-16-2014, 02:40 PM   #7
Barcey
Wizard
Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Barcey ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Barcey's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,531
Karma: 8059866
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo H2O / Aura HD / Glo / iPad3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate the great View Post
It won't be an issue.

What Torrent Freak missed was that in this situation the digital watermarks will only be able to identify the ebook retailer that sold the file, not the person who bought it. And since this is not an encryption type of DRM but instead closer akin to metadata, there's no need to remove it.

The digital watermark DRM is being used to secure the supply chain. How exactly that is going to help, I do not know.

Most ebook retailers already use encryption DRM like Adobe, Kindle, iBooks, so I don't see how this effort will make it more secure.

http://the-digital-reader.com/2014/0...-layer-ebooks/
I believe what they're trying to identify is when ebooks show up on torrents before they're available for sale. In that case it's obviously been leaked in their supply chain but they currently don't know where.
Barcey is offline   Reply With Quote