View Single Post
Old 09-15-2014, 07:53 PM   #91
pwalker8
Grand Sorcerer
pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pwalker8 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,196
Karma: 70314280
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Device: iPad Pro, iPad mini, Kobo Aura, Amazon paperwhite, Sony PRS-T2
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieTigger View Post
Who cares about initially? You are still hoping that Apple will turn over on appeal. And I hope they don't. And even if Apple magically overturns, it changes nothing in regard of Amazon.

You are clutching at straws when you want Apple to use Microsoft as precedent when it comes to impartiality of judge.
You should read a bit more carefully. No where do I say that Apple should use Microsoft as precedent when it comes to impartiality of judge. Lack of impartiality has been grounds for appeal for a very long time. Anyway, given that Apple filed their appeal last winter/spring and I didn't see any mention in the posted appeal, it's somewhat too late for me to "want Apple to use Microsoft as precedent" regardless. What I am pointing out is that there are a lot of parallels between the two cases. The basic facts of the Microsoft case (that Microsoft was bundling a browser for free while others were trying to sell browsers) are rather different the basic facts in the Apple case (that Apple proposed moving to an agency model rather than a wholesale model).
pwalker8 is offline   Reply With Quote