View Single Post
Old 05-31-2006, 11:45 AM   #49
Riocaz
Fulfilled but not by iRex
Riocaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Riocaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Riocaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Riocaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Riocaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Riocaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Riocaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Riocaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Riocaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Riocaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Riocaz ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 932
Karma: 286846
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Device: Far too many
Quote:
Originally Posted by oliverbogler
Yes - I agree. They could have handled the communication much better. I think that unexpected things have happened though, and I wonder how professional it would have appeared to post successive reasons on the site for each delay? For example: the "pdf reader isn't ready" and one week later "the power management software isn't ready" etc etc. Do you see my point? I think that companies now tend towards monolithic silence and this is perhaps why.

However, now that they have created expectations, I totally agree with you that they should post a statement giving us a feel for the reasons and the time frame. This would only make us less upset. In any case, the uncertainty in this community is not working in their favor...
Indeed which is why I have been pushing for a generic response from them.

I don't expect a "this isn't ready yet" or "We will launch at 3:27:43 on the 18th of June" just a "We know you are anxious and we are working on it"

I can understand they are leery of making a definative statement. But I don't think anyone expects them to make one. We just want something.
Riocaz is offline   Reply With Quote