View Single Post
Old 09-11-2014, 09:39 PM   #6
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,438
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sydney's Mom View Post
Don't you think maybe 43% read before bed?
No, but I may be a bit more cynical than is healthy.

Quote:
But, I cannot remember the name of the book without looking at my kindle.
How the pollster scored lying would be pretty controversial, for sure. Personally, I was impressed with this next book and would look for the signs of deception it describes, rather than the actual content:

Spy the Lie: Former CIA Officers Teach You How to Detect Deception

The Amazon description, I should caution, is overblown. You can't tell that someone is lying using the techniques -- all you can say is that there are signs of deception. But in a poll, where everything is a matter of averaged probabilities, it might work well.

Also, if the interviewee named a book title that just doesn't exist, or was written by a different author, I think we would be safe in putting it down as probable prevarication.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote