View Single Post
Old 09-10-2014, 10:44 AM   #87
Shane R
Fanatic
Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Shane R ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 518
Karma: 4274548
Join Date: Nov 2013
Device: None
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotbob View Post
My understanding is beyond a certain point that you can't see the pixels, it doesn't matter.
Quote:
The resolution of the screens (1334 x 750 for the iPhone 6; 1920 x 1080 for the iPhone 6 Plus) is high, although nowhere near the “quad HD” resolution of both the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 or LG G3. But screen resolution is almost beside the point, since pixel densities these days are beyond the capacity of the human eye to differentiate. The new Retina display is using something called dual-domain pixels that Apple claims increase viewing angle and contrast. We’ll be curious to see how this display stands up to our lab tests, but on first look photos looked very nice, while text popped almost like you’d expect on an e-reader.
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/n...plus/index.htm

Quote:
The 6 Plus's pixels are so tiny they're hard to see no matter how close you get your face, whereas one can just about make out the ones on the regular iPhone 6 if you look hard enough. Put them both at arm's reach and the difference is imperceptible, so don't let that guide a buying decision.
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/...-6-plus-tested
Shane R is offline   Reply With Quote