View Single Post
Old 11-18-2008, 08:55 PM   #55
desertgrandma
Enjoying the show....
desertgrandma ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.desertgrandma ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.desertgrandma ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.desertgrandma ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.desertgrandma ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.desertgrandma ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.desertgrandma ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.desertgrandma ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.desertgrandma ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.desertgrandma ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.desertgrandma ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
desertgrandma's Avatar
 
Posts: 14,270
Karma: 10462843
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Arizona
Device: A K1, Kindle Paperwhite, an Ipod, IPad2, Iphone, an Ipad Mini & macAir
Quote:
Originally Posted by rlauzon View Post
You keep asserting that it's negligence without backing it up with any argument.
So I'll ask yet again: how is it negligence to have an open network?



Argument:
You claim your network is secure.
The bad guys used your network to commit a crime.
Since your network is secure, the bad guys must have had your cooperation, which makes you an accessory.

It's a rather simple argument and, unless the court is tech savvy, one that is reasonable.

Wrong, oh kemo sabe. I claim I secured my network as recommended by my network provider, using their guidelines, to prevent unauthorized used of my bandwidth.
Now, tell me how in the widest stretch of the imagination you can possibly say I 'conspired' or in anyway helped thieves gain access??

(sorry, would have answered sooner but was away.....)
desertgrandma is offline   Reply With Quote