View Single Post
Old 09-09-2014, 09:26 PM   #57
holymadness
Guru
holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.holymadness ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
holymadness's Avatar
 
Posts: 722
Karma: 2084955
Join Date: Dec 2010
Device: iPhone
Quote:
Originally Posted by DuckieTigger View Post
iphone compared to competitors:

http://www.itproportal.com/2014/09/0...cs-comparison/

Looks like Apple only got a nicer design any more?
I got to the second paragraph before reading this:

"Samsung opted for the same 1080p (Full HD) screen that it packed into its Galaxy S4, helping to conserve battery life. Apple, meanwhile, has gone for a slightly lower resolution on its screen, opting for 1,704 x 960 pixels instead of 1,920 x 1,080, for a total 416ppi compared to Samsung's 423.64ppi."



According to the Apple website, the 6+ has a resolution of "1920-by-1080-pixel resolution at 401 ppi." The iPhone 6 has a "1334-by-750-pixel resolution at 326 ppi." As far as I can tell, the dimensions and resolution cited by your article were simply made up.

I didn't bother reading the rest but it's probably full of the same kinds of errors. Please post reliable sources only, thanks.
holymadness is offline   Reply With Quote