View Single Post
Old 11-18-2008, 05:54 PM   #50
rlauzon
Wizard
rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.
 
rlauzon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertgrandma View Post
It may not be illegal, but it is certainly negligence. Failing to take proper precautions.
You keep asserting that it's negligence without backing it up with any argument.
So I'll ask yet again: how is it negligence to have an open network?

Quote:
Originally Posted by desertgrandma View Post
I'm sorry, but I just can't buy your argument. In this day and age, you must take whatever care you can to keep from being a victim. Saying that securing your connection links you to the crime committed by thieves is ludicrous.
Argument:
You claim your network is secure.
The bad guys used your network to commit a crime.
Since your network is secure, the bad guys must have had your cooperation, which makes you an accessory.

It's a rather simple argument and, unless the court is tech savvy, one that is reasonable.
rlauzon is offline   Reply With Quote