View Single Post
Old 11-18-2008, 04:48 PM   #48
rlauzon
Wizard
rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.
 
rlauzon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Jordan View Post
You could claim ignorance in either case, and it would probably have the same impact on the court.
Sure. If the court was made up of people who knew about wireless networks, which probably won't be the case.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Jordan View Post
But if your network was secured, you could claim that you did what you could to restrict such access, to a reasonable degree.
Which means that you are probably an accessory to the crime and lying to the court about your involvement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Jordan View Post
If you left it open, you could easily be held liable due to negligence (where ignorance is considered no excuse).
What negligence? It's not illegal to open your wireless network. It may be a violation of your contract with your service provider, but there's no law against an open network.
rlauzon is offline   Reply With Quote