Quote:
Originally Posted by PatNY
Hi Charles ...
Personally, I much prefer a slower track, where the releases are a little more stable than what might be issued in the alternative schedule proposed.
CC more than meets my needs as is, so anything else is just gravy. As such, I don't see much benefit to risking instability in the libraries on my devices.
|
This is another argument for two communities, alpha and beta. Having both alpha and beta groups is supported by google so I could do that.
Quote:
To veer a little off topic, I was just wondering how much of the future enhancements/changes in CC will be dependent on having Calibre 2.0 or higher. I have avoided updating Calibre because I read 2.0 is incompatible with XP, and I am still on XP on multiple computers. I am happy with Calibre 1.40 and don't feel the need to update that, but if it prevents me from enjoying new CC features in the future, then I may rethink things.
--Pat
|
There is already one CC feature that depends on calibre 2, the "Use wireless device driver template for content server paths" option. I have two more almost finished, auto-sync changed books (the book file itself) and temp-mark books that have had read information synced. Compatibility with USB connections may require calibre changes. None of the others on the wish list jump out at me as requiring calibre changes, but then I haven't thought a lot about them.