View Single Post
Old 09-04-2014, 12:24 AM   #22
Nabeel
Zealot
Nabeel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nabeel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nabeel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nabeel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nabeel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nabeel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nabeel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nabeel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nabeel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nabeel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Nabeel ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Nabeel's Avatar
 
Posts: 147
Karma: 2747136
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Britain
Device: Kobo Aura One
Orwell's fiction is clumsy, there's no doubt about it. His best work is represented in his prose essays. Yet the key essay on style - 'The Politics of the English Language' - is an odd little piece. I feel certain that he started writing on one topic, and changed his mind half-way through about the issues he wanted to address. It's the essay in which he decries the use of acronyms: for example, if you write 'NATO' instead of 'North Atlantic Treaty Organisation', you're less likely to wonder why Turkey is part of the organisation.

The second half of 'The Politics of the English Language' does make some extremely valid points about how to write clearly.
Nabeel is offline   Reply With Quote