Not knowing much about sci-fi, I just checked out the
Wikipedia article on Baen Books and found this first paragraph -- with a footnote to the two-day-old Guardian article linked in the OP here:
Quote:
|
Baen Books is an American publishing company established in 1983 by science fiction publisher and editor Jim Baen. It is a science fiction and fantasy publishing house that specializes in military science fiction written for a right-wing readership.[1]
|
If a Wikipedian is reading this, they might want to look into this. As a Wikipedia user and fan, when I read an obviously controversial statement like this in a Wikipedia article, I don't get upset. Instead, I click on the Talk tab, where I usually see some back and forth on the issue, allowing me to make up my own mind. But, in this case, not only is an obviously controversial statement being presented as fact, there also is no Talk discussion.