View Single Post
Old 08-31-2014, 02:09 PM   #46
taosaur
intelligent posterior
taosaur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taosaur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taosaur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taosaur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taosaur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taosaur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taosaur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taosaur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taosaur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taosaur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.taosaur ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
taosaur's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,562
Karma: 21295618
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ohiopolis
Device: Kindle Paperwhite 2, Samsung S8, Lenovo Tab 3 Pro
No comment on Baen, as I haven't read any of their stuff, but as for this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Waylander View Post
The article was the usual tone from this particular journalist, who seems to sneer at anything other than lit-fic and poetry.
I'm not seeing any sign of such an attitude in the linked piece. The guy seems to be speaking as a fan of the genre, particularly the Culture novels, who happens to have some strong ideas about certain sub-genres, publishers, and trends. Is any mention of prose quality to be considered a "sneer," then?

It's admittedly a pet peeve of mine, but the 'persecution' of genre writing at the hands of cruel literature always strikes me as 80% shadow boxing. You're looking at a guy who has clearly read a wide array of science fiction, demonstrating an investment of thought and care in the genre, and you see sneers and think he only likes lit-fic? There's no indication in this article or a brief scan of his blog that he's ever read any lit-fic, and every indication that he's a fan of science fiction. He's a professional fan of science fiction, for reality's sake!

/rant
taosaur is offline   Reply With Quote