View Single Post
Old 08-26-2014, 09:42 AM   #103
sl42
Enthusiast
sl42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sl42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sl42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sl42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sl42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sl42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sl42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sl42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sl42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sl42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.sl42 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 43
Karma: 411648
Join Date: Aug 2014
Device: Kobo Mini
Quote:
Originally Posted by exaltedwombat View Post
A reader is a one-function tablet, optimised for that one job.

But if you need (or just enjoy) all the OTHER things a tablet does, and are going to carry one around and charge it daily anyway.... well, it really isn't as bad at reading ebooks as some of you like to believe.
For limited/moderate reading at least. My craptastic Android tablet gets, at best (with the screen dimmed to its lowest setting, wifi/gps/sound off) five to six hours between charges. Nowhere near good enough for an ebook reader, though it is what I relied on for a couple of years. Also, only useful indoors - absolutely impossible to read in sunlight. Basically, I hated the thing from the day I bought it, though it was a great upgrade from reading on my netbook.

About a month ago, I *FINALLY* got a Kobo Mini. Not only has my tablet not been turned on and used since, but honestly I don't even know where it is - probably under a stack of papers or lobbed in a box somewhere.

I'm blown away by the display quality of e-ink. Yes, I knew it would have a higher DPI than my tablet - but I am amazed by the fact that I cannot see pixels *at all* no matter how hard I squint. It's far better, in fact, than magazine print (where the dots of the print are plainly visible) let alone a traditional raster display. And, of course, many pricier readers have a higher DPI than my mini, but really I don't see the point since it really couldn't be improved any as far as my one good eye can tell.

Other than the visual quality, I would agree that a tablet is probably fine for someone that reads at most a few hours a day indoors, or doesn't mind spending much of their time chained to a power outlet so they can charge while reading.

That being said, the battery limitation probably isn't significant for the vast majority of people - most of whom will only read a handful of books in the course of a year and will almost never read anywhere near six hours in a day. So for most people the only limitation presented by a tablet is sunlight readability, which is far less of an issue.

This means that dedicated ereaders are definitely niche market devices, but it would take a *massive* improvement in tablets before they could fill that niche.
sl42 is offline   Reply With Quote